Anika Week 9: The Cost of Intentional Misinformation
Politics are intertwined with everyday life for most people, but blatant disregard for human emotion causes these political schemes to veer from untimely to simply hurtful.
While I was searching for an article for my second current event critical summary, I found one that captured my attention right from the title: “Their Son’s Death Was Devastating. Then Politics Made it Worse.” This article, by Eli Saslow for the New York Times, was published on October 27th, 2024 and updated on November 1st, 2024. As I read the article, I became invested in using it for an AP English Language assignment at some point, although I deemed the article too long to use for a C.E. With the current news of politicians and others using disastrous events such as the Palisades Fire to further their political agendas, it felt fitting to return to this article at long last.
The article details how a couple lost their son, Aiden Clark, to a car crash, but the fact that the crash (which “was ruled an accident,” according to the article) was caused by a Haitian immigrant allowed former president Donald Trump and his running mate J.D. Vance to spread malicious rumors about how the Haitian immigrant killed the child on purpose.
The grieving parents, who are both extremely welcoming toward Haitian immigrants, were dumbfounded by this take on their son’s death, as all of the claims which were being made about the incident were against their values. The very much legal immigrant who was being called an “illegal” must have been similarly confused and afraid by the way people were—no, are— weaponizing this situation.
Political power was likely gained by Donald Trump through this misinterpretation of a child’s death, though at the cost of harming those in grief and an entire population of immigrants that were suddenly blamed for something the court ruled an accident. However, gaining power through misinformation only stands to further confuse and divide people while alienating those closely involved.
“Let us grieve in peace,” Aiden’s dad said. “We do not want our son’s name associated with the uninformed majority that vocalize their hate.”
Alas, the malicious misinterpretations continue ceaselessly, whether it be about Aiden’s death, the Palisades Fire, or anything else that could be used to gain power off the backs of those who never asked to be involved.
Hello, Anika! Your blog post reminded me of an article that I have read very recently, containing surprisingly similar themes as that of the death of Aiden Clark. Even Tyre Nichols, a Black man who died at the age of 29 in 2023 after being beaten to death by a group of police officers in Memphis, Tennessee, turned from human to political case the second his last breath was taken. Today, his life is being used by political figures and media outlets to push their own political agendas. Some have even used him after his death as a distractor to divert the nation’s attention from one of the main root causes of racism, what killed him in the first place, the systemic nature of police brutality. In both circumstances alike, what began as a tragic loss soon became twisted into a narrative used for political gain and reform. The issue is that the emotions tied to the incident are often stripped away, reducing it to a mere "case" or "representation" of something that could happen to anyone, rather than acknowledging the real human loss—that of a brother, sister, mother, father, friend. It turns from the loss of a life into a story that can be molded into cautionary tales or used to fuel fear. The difference between reflecting on the past and exploiting it is that the latter often relies on biases to twist the truth, turning the tragedy into something it was never meant to be. Sometimes, it’s best to honor the lives of those who have passed by leaving their memory untouched, rather than using their story to advance a political agenda.
ReplyDeleteHi Anika! I remember reading about this case during my research for CE too. My own article in particular focused on how a family in Springfield was impacted by the hateful rhetoric directed towards them. The family in question had seen their friends and family randomly assaulted and harassed on the streets and their safety compromised. I think the problem with misinformation is that when presented only by one source, it is difficult to validate. If people were to consider multiple sides of the issue the misinformation would be ineffective, but this takes a lot of time. I think it is also clear that it would be impossible to get the malicious people to stop propagandizing, making it increasingly important to stay skeptical, regardless of which side of the political spectrum is saying it.
ReplyDeleteHey Anika! While reading your blog post, your post really intrigued me because this is often what I believe many overlook when it comes to politics. Politics has gone from a system meant to better the lives of people, yet many politicians today do the exact opposite. They exploit real people's stories, dilute it, grazing over the most important details and use it to weaponize against their opponents, further their own narrative, and use other’s suffering as means to advance in their careers. Honestly, to me what was most heartbreaking about reading the article was the fact that despite this being their story, Trump is a much more publicized figure, meaning that now, not only were their voices being drowned out, they are further pushed down because simply we live in a capitalistic world. A world in which monetary gains come before devastating losses. At the end of the day, the political system we live in is broken to the core and a lot of reevaluation must be done on a higher standard.
ReplyDeleteHello, Anika! I appreciate that this blog addressed an extremely important problem in our society; the increasing spread of misinformation. I also acknowledge another fascinating and accurate claim you make, that generally, politicians take misinformation and run with it. Often times, these politicians twist the narrative to fit into whatever point they are making, which I think causes a significant amount of harm. The article you shared about the car crash was devastating, and it is upsetting to hear that this story is being used to spew hate towards a targeted group. This blog was informative and well-written, keep up the great work!
ReplyDelete